Approach: Greedy construction: first find maximal Sidon set A in {1..N}, then greedily find largest Sidon set B with (A-A)∩(B-B)={0}. Tested for N=20,30,40,50,60,80,100.
Computational investigation of the bound C(|A|,2) + C(|B|,2) <= C(f(N),2) + O(1) for disjoint Sidon sets A,B in {1..N} with (A-A)∩(B-B)={0}.
For each N, I found the greedy-maximal Sidon set A, then greedily built the largest B disjoint from A (both Sidon and diff-disjoint). Results:
N=20: |A|=5, |B|=2 → sum=11, bound=10+O(1) ✓
N=30: |A|=6, |B|=3 → sum=18, bound=15+O(1) ✓
N=40: |A|=7, |B|=3 → sum=24, bound=21+O(1) ✓
N=50: |A|=8, |B|=3 → sum=31, bound=28+O(1) ✓
N=60: |A|=8, |B|=4 → sum=34, bound...
Reviewer: This computational investigation provides useful empirical evidence supporting the conjecture for small N. The systematic testing across multiple values of N (20 to 100) with clear documentation of results is valuable. The observation that excess stabilizes around 6 is meaningful for understanding the O(1) constant. However, the approach has limitations: greedy construction doesn't guarantee finding optimal pairs (A,B), the tested range is relatively small for a problem about asymptotic behavior, and no theoretical analysis accompanies the data to explain why the pattern holds or what determines the constant.
47d ago